It is the
VETERAN,
not the preacher,
who has given us freedom of religion. It is the VETERAN,
not the reporter,
who has given us freedom of the press. It is the VETERAN,
not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech.
It is the VETERAN, not the campus organizer, who has given us freedom to assemble.
It is the VETERAN,
not the lawyer, who has given us the right to a fair trial.
It is the VETERAN,
not the politician, Who has given us the right to vote.


It is the
VETERAN who salutes the Flag,

It is the VETERAN who serves under the Flag,

ETERNAL REST GRANT THEM O LORD, AND LET PERPETUAL LIGHT SHINE UPON
THEM.

God
Bless them all!!!

It is the
VETERAN,
not the preacher,
who has given us freedom of religion. It is the VETERAN,
not the reporter,
who has given us freedom of the press. It is the VETERAN,
not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech.
It is the VETERAN, not the campus organizer, who has given us freedom to assemble.
It is the VETERAN,
not the lawyer, who has given us the right to a fair trial.
It is the VETERAN,
not the politician, Who has given us the right to vote.


It is the
VETERAN who salutes the Flag,

It is the VETERAN who serves under the Flag,

ETERNAL REST GRANT THEM O LORD, AND LET PERPETUAL LIGHT SHINE UPON
THEM.

God
Bless them all!!!

Pictures are worth a thousand words

“Jefferson’s Manual” is an interpretive guide to parliamentary procedure, and is included (along with the Constitution) in the bound volumes of the Rules of the House of Representatives. It is ratified by each congress (including the current one), and has been updated continuously through the history of our democracy. The section covering impeachment lists the acceptable vehicles for bringing impeachment motions to the floor of the House.

Before the House Judiciary Committee can put together the Articles of Impeachment, someone must initiate the impeachment procedure. Most often, this occurs when members of the House pass a resolution. Another method outlined in the manual, however, is for individual citizens to submit a memorial for impeachment.

After learning this information, Minnesotan and Impeach for Peace member (Jodin Morey) found precedent in an 1826 memorial by Luke Edward Lawless which had been successful in initiating the impeachment of Federal Judge James H. Peck. Impeach for Peace then used this as a template for their “Do-It-Yourself Impeachment.” Now any citizen can download the DIY Impeachment Memorial and submit it, making it possible for Americans to do what our representatives have been unwilling to do. The idea is for so many people to submit the Memorial that it cannot be ignored.

Feel free to download it, print out TWO copies, fill in your relevant information in the blanks (name, State, notary is optional), and send in a letter today. We’re sending this wave in to Republican House Rep. Ron Paul who has spoken in favor of impeachment. There’s also extra credit for sending a DIY Impeachment to your own representative.
Get the PDF to send in, and DIRECTLY initiate the impeachment of Bush:
•Regular Version [pdf]•

•Extra Credit (your representative) [pdf]•

•For folks in District of Columbia [pdf]•

•District of Columbia Extra Credit!! [pdf]•

Here’s a view of my petition and cover letter, sent to Jenny Brown Waite, Feb 2, 2007

Pre-War Intelligence Acts `Inappropriate,’ U.S. Finds (Update4)

By Tony Capaccio

Feb. 9 (Bloomberg) — U.S. Defense Department officials prepared pre-war intelligence reports that may have exaggerated links between Iraq and al-Qaeda, the Pentagon inspector general said today.

Two offices set up under then-Undersecretary for Policy Douglas Feith before the March 2003 invasion of Iraq produced reports that formed the basis for the administration’s key pre- war claim that Saddam Hussein might provide weapons of mass destruction to the terrorist group.

These actions were authorized by then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, Inspector General Thomas Gimble told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

While “not illegal or unauthorized,” the actions “were inappropriate” because they did not “clearly show the variance with the consensus of the intelligence community,” Gimbel said.

Committee chairman Carl Levin called Gimbel’s report “devastating.” Feith’s operation produced what amounted to “an alternative analysis,” prepared “without the knowledge of the intelligence community,” that was used “to back a decision to go to war,” Levin said.

The committee released only the two-page executive summary of Gimble’s review, which was prepared at the request of Levin, Democrat of Michigan, and Republican Senator Pat Roberts of Kansas, former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Relationship

Levin and other critics contend that assessments produced by the Pentagon office were skewed to portray an active pre-war relationship between Hussein and the al-Qaeda terrorist organization, while the intelligence community saw virtually none. Following the U.S.-led invasion, al-Qaeda operatives did become active in Iraq, targeting U.S. forces and helping to foment sectarian violence.

“The Feith office is the one that produced the key alternative analysis which provided that material,” Levin said in an interview. “It was key, it was vital, it was what the White House used to make the linkage to terrorist groups.”

Gimbel cited a briefing given in September 2002 at the White House to National Security Adviser Steven Hadley and Lewis Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff. The briefing, given without Central Intelligence Agency approval, purported a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaeda that “was not supported by the available intelligence,” Gimbel said.

`Undercut’ CIA

Gimbel said Feith’s staff did not present CIA findings and further “undercut” the intelligence community by presenting a slide that said “there were fundamental problems” with the way the CIA and other analysts assessed information about the alleged Iraq-Iran link.

Levin said he planned to have his staff pursue this meeting, which came as the Bush administration was building the case for war that it would present to Congress and the United Nations.

He said he would have his staff interview the Feith analysts who briefed Hadley and Libby and would seek interviews with these two officials as well. He did not say whether he intended to question Feith.

Feith, now a professor of national security policy at Georgetown University in Washington who’s writing a book on the Iraq war, said the report shows “everything we did was lawful and authorized and we did not mislead Congress.”

“The issue of the appropriate process for policy people to use to criticize intelligence work is minor compared to the key conclusions,” Feith said in a written statement.

Republicans Dissent

Republicans on committee often disagreed strongly with Levin and the report’s findings.

“I strongly disagree,” Christopher Bond of Missouri, said. “How can something that is `authorized’ and `legal’ also be `inappropriate?’ That doesn’t pass the common sense test.”

James Inhofe of Oklahoma dismissed most of Gimble’s report as depicting a “turf battle” between competing bureaucrats.

“These matters have been scrutinized at least three times in the last three years by bipartisan, nonpartisan groups,” Inhofe said. The Senate Intelligence Committee, for example, “unanimously reported that it found that this process, the policy-makers’ probing questions, actually improved the CIA’s process,” he said.

Said Georgia Senator Saxby Chambliss: “I’m trying to figure out why we are here. We are beating this horse one more time.”

Gimbel, in his summary, said that, in future, the Pentagon’s closer relationship with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, set up in 2005, will “significantly reduce the opportunity for inappropriate conduct of intelligence activities outside of intelligence channels.”

White House, Pentagon Response

White House spokesman Dana Perino told reporters today she couldn’t describe the relationship between Feith and President George W. Bush but that Bush “has long acknowledged that the intelligence leading up to the war in Iraq was inaccurate.”

Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Karen Finn, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said “these matters have been scrutinized at least three times in the last three years by bipartisan and non- partisan groups,” and now the Pentagon Inspector General has concluded that the activities of Feith’s office “ were legal and authorized.”

Defense Secretary Robert Gates responded “I have a problem with that,” when Levin asked his views on the Feith operation during Gates’ confirmation hearing in December.

Levin said the report is valuable because it casts new light on the material the administration used to justify the war.

“If we are not going to repeat the mistakes of the past, there has got to be accountability,” Levin said. “You just repeat mistakes if there is no looking back and trying to find out what the facts were and holding people accountable the best way we can.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Tony Capaccio at acapaccio@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: February 9, 2007 15:58 EST

Technorati Tags: Bush WANTED

First, I shudder to think what Spc. Sheck’s superiors are going to do to him for saying this, on the record, to a reporter.

And second, as Atrios noted, “Don’t trouble your beautiful mind, Spc. Sheck. No one knows why we invaded Iraq, and no one really knows why we’re staying. Just stay safe.”

12 Comments»

1. Spc.Sheck is merely saying what many in the military now believe.

   The Military Times newspapers conduct an annual poll of the military, and here are the results for the military’s view of Iraq in 2006:

   The American military — once a staunch supporter of President Bush and the Iraq war — has grown increasingly pessimistic about chances for victory, according to the 2006 Military Times Poll.

   For the first time, more troops disapprove of the president’s handling of the war than approve of it. Barely one-third of service members approve of the way the president is handling the war.

   When the military was feeling most optimistic about the war — in 2004 — 83 percent of poll respondents thought success in Iraq was likely. This year, that number has shrunk to 50 percent.

   Only 35 percent of the military members polled this year said they approve of the way President Bush is handling the war, while 42 percent said they disapproved. The president’s approval rating among the military is only slightly higher than for the population as a whole. In 2004, when his popularity peaked, 63 percent of the military approved of Bush’s handling of the war. While approval of the president’s war leadership has slumped, his overall approval remains high among the military.

   Just as telling, in this year’s poll only 41 percent of the military said the U.S. should have gone to war in Iraq in the first place, down from 65 percent in 2003.

   The mail survey, conducted Nov. 13 through Dec. 22, is the fourth annual gauge of active-duty military subscribers to the Military Times newspapers. The results should not be read as representative of the military as a whole; the survey’s respondents are on average older, more experienced, more likely to be officers and more career-oriented than the overall military population.

   In other words, this is the view of leadership people of the military. A friend, who I believe is in a position to be knowledgeable, commented on this poll that this is the attitude of the Colonels, Lt. Colonels and Majors – the battlefield leadership.

   Specialist Sheck probably heard similar comments from his leaders in the unit and knows he’s safe.
   Comment by Tom Cleaver — 12/30/2006 @ 12:50 pm

2. Maybe the Bush Crime Family has nothing left to turn to but honesty: “We’re here to take your oil and make money off it for ourselves.”
   Comment by Ed Stephan — 12/30/2006 @ 12:51 pm
3. As the world reflects on the death of Saddam the dicator, it also worth recalling the words of President Bush on dictatorship:

   “A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there’s no question about it.”
   - President George W. Bush, July 26, 2001.

   “If this were a dictatorship, it’d be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I’m the dictator.”
   - President-elect George W. Bush, December 18, 2000.

   “You don’t get everything you want. A dictatorship would be a lot easier.”
   - Texas Governor George W. Bush, July 1998.
   Comment by AvengingAngel — 12/30/2006 @ 1:57 pm

4. I believe the gang in Crawford is thinking up just such a line to spout to Spc. Sheck and his brothers in arms as I write this. Whatever it is, the lie will be even less believable than all the others.
   Comment by petorado — 12/30/2006 @ 1:58 pm
5. Don’t forget the really significant symbolism of the date of his hanging, and think about what it means. During the festival of Eid, nobody is supposed to be punished. For the Shiites, Eid starts on Sunday this year- so Saddam’s hanging date wasn’t a problem… The Sunni Eid, however, started a day earlier, on Saturday.

   So the Shiites deliberately killed Saddam on a Sunni holy day. Petty, provocative, and pathetic. And we are busy defending these people why, exactly? They are deliberately trying to stir up the pot, yet again, with the Sunnis, and we are playing blind enablers to that.
   Comment by Castor Troy — 12/30/2006 @ 1:59 pm

6. Am I sorry that SH is now dead? Not so much. Do I think it is a major turning point or will somehow make things better? No. Anyone who thinks it is or will needs to put down the drugs and get to rehab.
   Comment by ET — 12/30/2006 @ 2:08 pm
7. The US Constitution states clearly “Congress alone has the right to declare war.” After 911, the spineless 109th do-nothing assholes gave the power to declare war to GW…..as grave an error anyone could ever make.
   This stupid, stubborn, petulant and egomanical idiot wants to add more troops telling all of us he is incapable of thinking or hearing anything but his own madness in the face of sure defeat.

   The 110 Congress needs to rescind the enormous powers given this idiot and take control again. They may have to impeach the Bush/Cheney team to do it, but do it they must! George Bush has been given the powers of a king, but possesses the mind of a 12 year old spoiled brat. This loser has never won anything in his life, he even went broke in the oil business. If it were not the fact he is a member of the Bush Crime family, he would be on welfare or in jail. Jail is where he belongs.

   SH is no longer an issue, he has not been one for a long time. Trust the corporate media to play it up, but it means nothing but more death and destruction. Killing him on a holy day is just more fuel to the fire, and the place is burning down and killing Americans and Iraq people daily. For what? Give Haliburton more money? Keep the price of gasoline up???
   Cement WW III and cause more global destruction? That makes the gunmakers and war contractors richer. What a hell these people have created.
   Comment by Marilyn — 12/30/2006 @ 2:34 pm

8. My response to Republicans who try to justify the war in Iraq: the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.

   Those who had good intentions allowed those without to create this Hell.

   Thanks, Castor Troy, for the info about the holidays. I wondered why they were suddenly rushing to execute him.
   Comment by ml — 12/30/2006 @ 2:56 pm

9. Sorry to disagree, but I think Hussein is an issue, and will continue to be an issue for some years to come.

   Yes—Saddam is gone, but only in the human form. CT alludes to the belief that the Shia executed a Sunni on a Sunni “holy day.” This merely inflates the concept of martyrdom to an even more volatile degree. Al-Maliki and his Shia friends have once again failed to recognize that although Saddam is no longer in command of his military force, that force still exists in subtlety. Example—if one former member of the Republican Guard walks into a crowded Shia marketplace, blows himself to Allah, and takes 60 or 70 infidels with him (Sunni belief has it that the Shia are not “true Muslims”), how long will it take to whittle the odds down to a more manageable size?
   Comment by Steve (all ReThugs are cordially invited to pound salt and die) — 12/30/2006 @ 2:58 pm

10. I’m sure we’re going to see this TV ad soon:

    Big beaming W on TV:

    “Sure, I had to wreck the country, put it in debt, wreck the military, kill a whole buncha people, and then there’s what I had to do to Iraq…

    But I think my weewee has grown a whole 1/4 inch!

    Would I do it again? You betcha!”

    Flash to overlay:

    Get your own bigger weewee with 120 monthly payments of 10 billion dollars. Some lethal side effects will occur.
    Comment by Glen — 12/30/2006 @ 3:06 pm

11. Best enlarger ad I’ve seen, Glen#10.

    And second, as Atrios noted, “Don’t trouble your beautiful mind, Spc. Sheck. No one knows why we invaded Iraq, and no one really knows why we’re staying. Just stay safe.”

    Yep, don’t even bother to aim, just stick your weapon over the wall and shoot. If an officer gets too gung ho, well, that why grenades roll.
    Comment by Dale — 12/30/2006 @ 3:24 pm

12. Dear Spc. Sheck

    Thank You for your BRAVERY…
    Your willingness NOT ONLY to SERVE OUR COUNTRY
    But to BRAVELY SPEAK OUT like a TRUE PATRIOT
    when you can plainly SEE WHAT’S WRONG…

    We were ALWAYS in IRAQ for OIL INTERESTS…
    Dick Cheney was SUMMONED to SAUDI ARABIA
    last November and sternly ordered to keep YOU
    and other members of the Military there for SAUDI INTERESTS.

    You NO LONGER HAVE A COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, Sir.
    Rather, You have a KING for a commander, now…
    PLAIN AND SIMPLE:
    SO MANY of you have died for this reason!!!
    The White House is IGNORING all advice to pull you out…
    EVEN to PROPERLY EQUIP YOU AND YOUR FELLOW SOLDIERS…
    They will IGNORE the IRAQI STUDY GROUP…
    THEY HAVE IGNORED THE ELECTIONS…
    THEY CASUALLY TAKE THEIR TIME making ANY kind of DECISIONS
    While they play STAY THE COURSE IN CAMOUFLAGE…
    They soon will be ordering more of your BUDDIES to the battlefield…
    WE THE PEOPLE WANT YOU HOME SPC. SHECK
    YOUR OWN MOTHERS AND FAMILY HAVE TO SEND YOU SILLY STRING…
    NOT YOUR OWN COMMANDERS…
    Can you say that about the SOLDIERS FOR HIRE????
    Your Commander’s EGO will not allow the OIL FIELDS to fall into SUNI CONTROL…
    Take heart that Little by Little…
    The Truth is EMERGING…

    WE WANT YOU HOME SPC. SHECK…
    IT’S DICK CHENEY AND KING ABDULLAH WHO THINK OTHERWISE…
    Comment by Sanchez — 12/30/2006 @ 9:02 pm

The fifth anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001, served as the reflex hammer touch to the knee of American conscience. As the country attended memorials and revisited painful memories of 9/11, the reflection also opened our collective mind once again to the many unanswered questions, legitimate concerns and conflicting evidence in the official description of those events.

For us at the Daily Tidings the event served to open discussion among us about this complex subject, about the conspiracy theories that abound in Internet chats, blogs and so-called investigative reports and most importantly, the questions regarding the media’s role in this ongoing issue.

A month later we have found very little we all agreed on. We especially disagree on the role of the media. Since the Tidings doesn’t cover New York City, Washington, D.C. or the federal government, the ambiguity is shaded with absolution.

Nevertheless we are each members of the fourth estate, an essential conglomeration of individuals who adhere to professional guidelines, and who care passionately about this demanding and often thankless opus. With that membership — we can all agree on some level — comes a responsibility to giving the public the accurate information it needs to make informed decisions. Thus, somewhere in all the banter, we stumbled on one thing we at the Tidings’ truly can agree on.

Apparently, we are not alone. Based on the results of this hallmark 2006 election, the American people are finally asking for change. They don’t like our involvement in Iraq. They voted out many members of the party that put us there. Perhaps they are also ready to question the events and decisions that put us there as well. Perhaps they are ready to ask what really happened on Sept. 11.

We think so. And we call on our colleagues to join us in asking questions.

Every single American daily newspaper must demand of our congressional leaders and those in the executive branch that an independent council be formed to completely and thoroughly investigate the deaths of nearly 3,000 American citizens in the attack of 9/11 — an attack that took place on American soil.

Forget the conspiracy theories for a minute and set aside the political gamesmanship. We are a country that spent five years and $100 million investigating President Clinton. We probed the depths of the Iran-Contra scandal — a debacle that would have never come fully into the public eye had a special investigator not been appointed.

This administration has spent far more energy and time seeking the leak of Valerie Plame’s identity and Barry Bonds’ use of steroids than it has in fully explaining how three skyscrapers crumbled in an instant and nearly 3,000 people were killed. While an independent investigation may never fully answer every question, it will help to heal the wounds of this nation and widespread distrust of our leaders this attack has caused.

This historic tragedy ranks among the worst days in American history. We owe it to every American — but especially those who do battle on our behalf at the behest of our leaders — to spare no expense and allow no party loyalty to dissuade us. The government works for us. If it failed us, either in malfeasance or incompetence, then we must know that. If our current actions around the world are shaped by misinformation, we must know that too. Finally, if what we now believe to be true is only further proven, we would do well to hear the evidence that confirms it. If the government’s version of the events of that day are absolutely true, then scrutiny will amplify that truth and lay to rest the skepticism that remains to this day.

If, however, the questions that remain serve to shed light on new information, that too serves the public. And it is the responsibility of this trusted media industry to dig, probe, investigate and uncover the truth behind government events and decisions that impact the public. On this Veterans Day, we can do no less on behalf of the brave men and women who have been sent to the Middle East based upon rationale that stems directly from the events of 9/11. While we pay homage to all veterans of the Armed Forces today, we are reminded of our duty to watch closely those leaders in the White House and Congress who make the decisions to send our troops to war.

We invite every single American daily newspaper to join us in our demand for an independent council to completely and thoroughly investigate the deaths of nearly 3,000 American citizens in the attacks of 9/11.

America will be better informed, and this is our job.

Technorati Tags: Anniversaries, pause and reflect, troops into battle, porno times, Sept. 11, 2001, American conscience, the Daily Tidings, the Daily Tidings,

Technorati Tags: Anniversaries, pause and reflect, troops into battle, porno times, Sept. 11, 2001, American conscience, the Daily Tidings, the Daily Tidings,

powered by performancing firefox

[grouper=mtg/mtgPlayer.swf?gvars=vurl~http%3a%2f%2fgrouper.com%2frss%2fflv.ashx%3fid%3d1624117_rf%7e1063132_vfver~8_ap~1_extid~-1;321;265]

Put together some pics and a Great song by Less Visible! Apparently Google has added some ads after my video, guess that’s what you get for a free service:)
Add a video comment to this video

Government Targets American Bloggers As Enemy Propagandists
Military, Homeland Security, Bush White House strategy sharpen knives against anyone critical of the “war on terror”

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | October 17 2006

Recent scientific polls that show around 84% don’t believe the government’s explanation behind 9/11 and others confirming the fact that support for the war in Iraq is at an all time low have led the Bush administration to sharpen their knives against the new breed of perceived “enemy propagandists,” bloggers, journalists and online activists who dissent against the “war on terror.”

As Raw Story reports , CENTCOM announced earlier this year that a team of employees would be “[engaging] bloggers who are posting inaccurate or untrue information, as well as bloggers who are posting incomplete information.”

So when you’re wasting your time arguing the finer points of the collapse of Building 7 or the quagmire in Iraq with someone who seems unable to grasp basic principles, your foe could well be sat behind a plush U.S. government desk in a uniform.

CENTCOM is infiltrating blogs and message boards to ensure people, “have the opportunity to read positive stories,”presumably about how Iraq is a wonderful liberated democracy and the war on terror really is about protecting Americans.

The CENTCOM website features a useful section, “What Extremists Are Saying,” which provides a full catalogue and showcases the diatribes of US government agents Abu Mus’ab al-Zarqawi , Ayman al-Zawahiri and their sympathizers – rhetoric that CENTCOM hopes surfers will seek out in order for them to grasp a true understanding for the necessity of bombing the shit out of another broken backed defenseless country in the name of “freedom.”

The jaw-dropping hypocrisy of a regime and its military attack arm that has engaged in the most gargantuan of deceit and propaganda purges against the American people then pointing the finger at inquisitive bloggers for “aiding the enemy,” is alarming to behold.

President George W. Bush looks up as he signs the Military Commissions Act of 2006 in the East Room of the White House in Washington. The bill effectively nullifies nine of the first ten amendments to the U.S. constitution and ends the “great experiment” known as The United States of America.
The White House has made it perfectly clear that it will target American citizens for propagating information harmful to the interests of the U.S. government and classify them as enemy combatants. This is codified in sub-section 27 of section 950v. of the Military Commissions Act of 2006.

Bush’s own strategy document for “winning the war on terror” identifies “conspiracy theorists,” meaning anyone who exposes government corruption and lies about major domestic and world events, as “terrorists recruiters,” and vows to eliminate their influence in society.
“The DVD of the resistance!” Get TerrorStorm on DVD today! Subscribe to Prison Planet.tv and see it in high quality or watch it for free at Google Video .

In a speech given Monday, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a “terror training camp,” through which “disaffected people living in the United States” are developing “radical ideologies and potentially violent skills.”

Chertoff has pledged to dispatch Homeland Security agents to local police departments in order to aid in the apprehension of domestic terrorists who use the Internet as a political tool.

How long before influential online writers, bloggers and journalists like Greg Palast, who was charged with aiding the terrorists when filming “critical U.S. infrastructure,” are arbitrarily gunned down on the street like in Russia or the newly “free” Iraq?

The Bush administration’s media mouthpieces have also been mobilized to stereotype any kind of critical thinking as “giving aid and comfort to the enemy,” a recent case in point being Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly calling for the FBI to investigate the 9/11 Scholars organization for possible ties to terrorist organizations.

Will we witness a “night of the long knives” to silence any and all dissent as the official dictatorship is announced or does the chilling effect of simply threatening to treat bloggers and journalists as terrorists go far enough to intimidate enough people to keep their mouths shut?

A combination of this chilling effect and moves to license websites, impose “hate speech” restrictions and kill off the old internet in favor of a government regulated, China-style “Internet 2″ are the tools in the arsenal of the neo-fascists who wish to continue their domestic and imperial bloodletting under the mandated consensus of total obedience.

Technorati Tags: GOVERNMENT TARGETS AMERICAN BLOGGERS, fate, tom paine, nathan hale

Technorati Tags: GOVERNMENT TARGETS AMERICAN BLOGGERS, fate, tom paine, nathan hale

powered by performancing firefox

Proof Positive (Full Length, High Quality) Getting it in the face, no holds barred, over six thousand screwed, watch the full length video free now! She’s taking a licking!! CLICK THE PLAY BUTTON WHEN SHE LOADS!

]]> http://votedavegregory.wordpress.com/2006/10/30/what-the-video-proves/feed/ 0 David Gregory http://votedavegregory.wordpress.com/2006/10/15/my-son-and-grandson-both-in-iraq/ http://votedavegregory.wordpress.com/2006/10/15/my-son-and-grandson-both-in-iraq/#comments Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:39:26 +0000 EYEONCITRUS http://votedavegregory.wordpress.com/2006/10/15/my-son-and-grandson-both-in-iraq/ ]]> My son, SSgt Zachary Gregory and my Grandson, Mark Greory, whose in the Marines are both in Iraq now. Mark has been there about two months and Zac left a few weeks ago. I pray and hope all of our troops return home soon, safe and sound!

Book Description
Many US experts and the Bush administration believe that the US came out of the Aug 2003 six-party talks aimed at halting North Korea’s nuclear weapons program in a stronger position than it went in-not least because the D.P.R.K. (North Korea) upset the other states, particularly Russia and China, by threatening to test nuclear weapons while the US lined up with the other states to advocate a non-nuclear Korean Peninsula. A more nuanced assessment of the talks indicates that the outcome may be far less favorable to the US-and for nonproliferation-than the Bush administration asserts. Contrary to the blithe talk of hardliners, the lack of progress to date and the poor prospects for future talks reveal the limits of political and military coercion to achieve nonproliferation goals on Korea.

This digital document is an article from Arms Control Today, most recently published by Arms Control Association on October 31, 2003. The length of the article is 4163 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Bush’s Bipolar Disorder and the Looming Failure of Multilateral Talks With North Korea
Author: Peter Hayes
Publication: Arms Control Today (Commentary)
Date: October 31, 2003
Publisher: Arms Control Association
Volume: 33 Issue: 8 Page: 3-6

Distributed by ProQuest Information and Learning

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.

Contrary to the blithe talk of hardliners, the lack of progress to date and the poor prospects for future talks reveal the limits of political and military coercion to achieve nonproliferation goals in Korea.

Many U.S. “experts” and the Bush administration believe that the United States came out of the August 2003 six-party talks aimed at halting North Korea’s nuclear weapons program in a stronger position than it went in-not least because the D.P.R.K. (North Korea) upset the other states, particularly Russia and China, by threatening to test nuclear weapons while the United States lined up with the other states to advocate a non-nuclear Korean Peninsula.

Unfortunately, these pundits and…

From Publishers Weekly
With the midterm elections—and the possibility of majority shifts in both the House and Senate—talk of presidential impeachment is in the air. Holtzman, former congresswoman and Brooklyn D.A., and Cooper, a journalist and lawyer, have assembled a compact but thorough legal and constitutional accounting of five major issues upon which they claim the current president could be impeached. They are “Deceptions into Taking the Country into War in Iraq”; “Reckless Indifference to Human Life in Katrina and Iraq”; “Illegal Wiretapping and Surveillance of Americans”; “Permitting Torture”; and “Leaking Classified Information.” While the authors have a clear political agenda, their book also provides a useful guide to the theory behind and the legal mechanisms of presidential impeachment, clearing up many misunderstandings readers might have, such as the fact that “high crimes and misdemeanors are not limited to actual crimes” and the correct use of the Independent Counsel Act (which Holtzman helped author in 1978). The book argues its points based on examples from the impeachments of Nixon and Clinton (Holtzman sat on the House Judiciary Committee during the Nixon impeachment). While this volume will be read and cherished by those who agree with its political stance—and dismissed and argued against by those who don’t—it’s an important, comprehensive argument and document for our current political moment. (Oct.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Book Description
No one is better placed or qualified to call for the impeachment of George W. Bush than Elizabeth Holtzman. She is a former Congresswoman and Brooklyn District Attorney who was a vital member of the House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment of President Richard Nixon.

In The Impeachment of George W. Bush, Holtzman and her coauthor, acclaimed journalist Cynthia L. Cooper, have written a clear, lucid and damning legal brief that reveals that the 43rd President of the United States of America has committed high crimes and misdemeanors.

This book focuses on four articles of impeachment: The Offense of Wiretapping Surveillance in Defiance of the Law; the Offence of Lying and Inducing America to Support a War; The Offense of Reckless Indifference to the Lives and Welfare of American Troops; The Offense of Torture in Violation of U.S. Laws and Treaties. It also provides an invaluable guide to how citizens can get involved in campaigning for impeachment, as well as an important historical analysis of impeachments past. The publication of this book is a summons to action in this process.